![]() This institution is using Interfolio's Faculty Search to conduct this search. Applications in the reserve pool may then be reviewed in the order in which they were received, until the position is filled. Applications will continue to be accepted on a rolling basis for a reserve pool. Lauren Balconi, Coordinator for Appointments Committee, with any questions: application deadline is May 15, 2020. To apply, please submit a letter of interest, a C.V., and at least three references. Capacity to work in a collaborative law clinic.Interest in developing First Amendment litigation experience,.At least three years litigation experience, and.The purpose of the fellowship is to enable an experienced litigator to shift gears and develop a new expertise in First Amendment litigation. This is a year-to-year lecturer rank position, starting August 15, 2020, with the possibility of renewal for a second year. The First Amendment Clinic is now hiring a First Amendment Fellow. The Clinic takes on a wide array of cases and controversies, including defense against libel claims, access to courts, access to government documents, opposing prior restraints and subpoenas of journalists, and defending the civil rights of those who are censored by the government. The Clinic trains law students to promote and defend free speech interests, by taking both ordinary cases that will help students develop their skills and impact litigation that aims to extend First Amendment precedent in the courts. The ASU College of Law, located in Phoenix, AZ, launched a First Amendment Clinic in 2018, thanks to a generous gift from the Stanton Foundation. Statutory privilege for child-parent communications is proposed in Part V and discussion of issues that need to be resolved before adoption of a privilege are included in Part VI.THE ASU COLLEGE OF LAW is hiring a fellow for its First Amendment Clinic. In Part IV several methods for establishing a child-parent privilege will be discussed. In Part III social policy considerations will be reviewed based on traditional values of family integrity and contemporary knowledge about childhood development from the psychological and delinquency literature. In this manner a child may inadvertently incriminate himself and even waive his right to counsel. When a court compels a parent to testify about a child's confidences the court indirectly obtains information that a child could not be forced to divulge. Next, arguments are made that protection of the child's constitutional right to an attorney and the privilege against self-incrimination may depend on the child's ability to confer privately and without inhibition with a parent or guardian. The implications of constitutional protection of family privacy, parentalĪutonomy and children's rights for a privilege are discussed. In Part II the constitutional premises for a child-parent privilege are examined. In Part I the nature and rationale of recognized evidentiary privileges will be reviewed to demonstrate that a proposed child-parent privilege would be in accord. ![]() This article will consider whether confidential communications between children and their parents should be privileged and therefore beyond the reach of legal process. Child-Parent Privilege for Confidential Communications: An Examination and Proposal ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |